Tulip Siddiq's Bangladesh Conviction Sparks Fair-Trial Debate

British Labour MP Tulip Siddiq has condemned a Dhaka court’s decision to convict her in her absence on corruption charges, describing the process as deeply unfair. The ruling comes amid a broader wave of prosecutions linked to the 2024 ouster of Bangladesh’s former prime minister and her allies. Siddiq, who lives in London, says she will challenge what she calls a flawed proceeding.

What happened in court

The court found Siddiq guilty of pressuring her aunt, former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, to obtain a land plot for her family on the outskirts of Dhaka. Siddiq has consistently denied any wrongdoing and notes she has not been able to participate in the proceedings. The trial began in August, and Siddiq remains based abroad, making it unlikely she would serve a prison term in the United Kingdom.

Judge Rabiul Alam handed down a two-year prison sentence and a fine of £620. If the fine is not paid, the sentence could extend by six months. Siddiq’s defence teams in both the United Kingdom and Bangladesh say they are pursuing proper legal avenues.

Reaction and concerns about due process

In a statement, Siddiq argued there were no formal summons, no charge sheet, and no direct contact from Bangladeshi authorities, describing the experience as a Kafkaesque nightmare. She said she had learned of the conviction through the media and stressed she had always maintained her innocence.

Labour colleagues and several senior lawyers have raised concerns about the fairness of the process. A letter spearheaded by former Justice Secretary Robert Buckland, former Attorney General Dominic Grieve, and Lady Cherie Blair criticized the trial for lacking robust legal representation and described it as artificial and unfair. The Labour Party has said it cannot recognise the judgement while noting Siddiq remains a member of the party and the parliamentary whip in the House of Commons.

Context and wider implications

Bangladesh’s authorities have pursued a number of high-profile cases against Hasina, her associates, and family members since she was ousted. Hasina is currently facing other prosecutions, including a separate death sentence in connection with a crackdown on protests. The government says the prosecutions are part of fighting corruption, while critics say the judiciary has been exposed to political pressure.

There is no extradition treaty between the United Kingdom and Bangladesh, a factor that has influenced Siddiq’s ability to be physically present in court or return for further proceedings. Siddiq has resigned from a junior government post in the UK amid controversy over her close ties to Hasina, but continues to serve as a Labour MP with the party’s whip.

Expert perspective

Legal observers say the case highlights serious questions about due process and independence in high-stakes political prosecutions, especially where media coverage shapes public perception. Some analysts warn the proceedings could strain perceptions of fairness in Bangladesh’s judiciary, and potentially complicate ties with partners abroad.

What happens next

Possible avenues include an appeal or additional legal challenges. Siddiq’s status as an elected MP remains, with no confirmed disciplinary action announced by the Labour Party at this stage.

Summary

The Dhaka court convicted Tulip Siddiq in her absence of corruption-related charges tied to land for family members. Siddiq maintains her innocence and criticizes the process as unfair and influenced by media coverage. The case forms part of broader legal actions against Hasina’s circle and has drawn attention from international legal figures and observers about judicial fairness. The UK has not extradited Siddiq, emphasizing the complexity of cross-border prosecutions in politically sensitive cases.

Key insight: The Siddiq case underscores concerns about due process and media influence in politically charged prosecutions, drawing international attention to Bangladesh’s judiciary.

Source