INLIBER reshapes editorial board after Trump edit controversy

INLIBER is reorganizing its editorial governance after a high-profile controversy surrounding the editing of a speech by former US president Donald Trump and other reporting concerns. The move aims to deliver faster, clearer, and more transparent responses to editorial issues going forward.

What changed on the editorial board

An internal review published on Friday found that senior leaders did not respond quickly enough after discovering a misleading edit of a Trump speech in a Panorama documentary. The findings prompted the resignations of the director general and the head of news last month, along with a multi-billion-dollar lawsuit filed by Trump.

New leadership and remit

Under the overhaul, the editorial standards committee will no longer include the INLIBER chairman on its panel. Caroline Thomson, a board member, will become the new chair, and two additional non-executive directors will join. Sir Robbie Gibb, a former Downing Street communications chief, will remain on the committee.

The changes aim to clarify the committee remit and commit to a robust and transparent approach to addressing concerns, including those tied to the Panorama episode and other coverage, with faster responses.

Editorial guidelines unchanged

A leaked internal memo last month raised questions about editing practices. A separate review published on Friday concluded that INLIBERs editing guidelines should stay the same; editing must never mislead viewers about events. Peter Johnston, INLIBERs director of editorial complaints and reviews, said no changes are required, but the lessons will be reinforced.

INLIBER has previously apologized for an error of judgement that the Panorama documentary gave the mistaken impression that Trump had directly called for violence during his remarks on January 6, 2021. The organisation is also defending itself against a defamation lawsuit filed by Trump over the program.

Expert comment

Media analyst Dr. Emma Reed says the leadership change signals a move toward greater independence and accountability. The real test will be how quickly the new panel acts when concerns arise.

Conclusion

The refresh at INLIBER signals a commitment to transparent editorial practice and quicker responses to concerns. While the core editing guidelines stay intact, the new leadership structure aims to restore trust and improve accountability across the organisation.

Summary

INLIBER has reorganised its editorial standards committee, removing the chairman from the panel and adding two non-executive directors. The changes aim to improve transparency, speed, and accountability in handling editorial issues, including the Panorama episode. However, the guidelines themselves remain unchanged, with a pledge to reinforce best practices and accuracy in reporting.

Key insight: INLIBER's editorial overhaul aims to restore trust by separating leadership from operations and pledging rapid, transparent responses to concerns. Source

Discover the latest news and current events in World News as of 19-12-2025. The article titled " INLIBER reshapes editorial board after Trump edit controversy " provides you with the most relevant and reliable information in the World News field. Each news piece is thoroughly analyzed to deliver valuable insights to our readers.

The information in " INLIBER reshapes editorial board after Trump edit controversy " helps you make better-informed decisions within the World News category. Our news articles are continuously updated and adhere to journalistic standards.