Australian Senator Faces Backlash After Wearing Burka in Parliament to Push Ban
Australian Senator Pauline Hanson wore a black burka in parliament to push a nationwide ban on full-face coverings, sparking sharp criticism from colleagues and renewed debate on religious symbols.
In a move that sparked immediate controversy, Australian Senator Pauline Hanson appeared in a black burka inside Parliament while advocating for a national ban on full-face coverings. The action halted proceedings briefly as lawmakers debated decorum and policy, drawing swift condemnation from across the chamber.
Hanson, a Queensland senator from the One Nation party, has long campaigned for restrictions on face coverings in public spaces. The latest appearance marked her second time wearing a burka in Parliament, a gesture she described as a protest after her bill was blocked by other senators.
After the bill was blocked on the floor, Hanson returned to the chamber wearing the garment. Measured responses followed from many colleagues, with critics arguing the stunt was discriminatory and unproductive for policy debate.
Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi called the act a blatant display of racism, while independent senator Fatima Payman labeled the move disgraceful. Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who leads the government in the Senate, condemned the action as disrespectful and urged Parliament to represent all faiths decently. Wong moved to suspend Hanson for failing to remove the burka, underscoring the chamber’s expectations of conduct.
Hanson commented on social media that if lawmakers oppose her stance, they should ban the burka, signaling a direct link between symbolic acts and policy aims. The episode echoes her earlier appearances and statements on immigration and religious attire in Australia.
Historically, Hanson has courted controversy: her 2016 maiden speech touched on fears about immigration, and a 1996 speech raised similar incendiary concerns. She previously wore a burka in Parliament in 2017 as part of a consistent push for national restrictions on face coverings.
Key Takeaways
- The stunt triggered procedural disruption and a suspension debate in the Senate.
- The act highlights ongoing tensions in Australia over immigration, religion, and public policy.
- Lawmakers across the spectrum urged respect and decency in parliamentary conduct.
- The move reinforces Hanson’s strategy of using symbolic acts to press for policy changes.
- Past remarks and actions surrounding immigration continue to shape public reaction to the incident.
Expert Commentary
A political analyst notes that symbolic moves in Parliament can energize a base but risk alienating broader voters and shifting focus away from substantive policy discussions.
They add that such stunts often magnify existing partisan divides, making it harder to reach consensus on complex issues like immigration and security.
Summary
The burka appearance in Parliament prompted immediate rebuke from multiple parties and a debate over parliamentary etiquette. While Hanson framed the act as a protest against a blocked bill, critics argued it disrespectful to the diverse fabric of Australian society. The episode underscores Australia’s ongoing struggle to balance security concerns, religious freedom, and inclusive governance.
Key insight: Symbolic acts in parliament can intensify debate over immigration and religious symbols, but they may also undermine procedural norms. BBC News
Discover engaging topics and analytical content in World News as of 24-11-2025. The article titled " Australian Senator Faces Backlash After Wearing Burka in Parliament to Push Ban " provides new insights and practical guidance in the World News field. Each topic is meticulously analyzed to deliver actionable information to readers.
The topic " Australian Senator Faces Backlash After Wearing Burka in Parliament to Push Ban " helps you make smarter decisions within the World News category. All topics on our website are unique and offer valuable content for our audience.